ArticleBMC medical education2026
Breaking bad news: self-assessment, attitude, and preferences of medical students in GCC countries.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Final-year medical students' experiences with breaking bad news: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreaking bad news (BBN) is an essential but challenging physician competency. Inadequate preparation for this task is linked to increased stress for both patients and clinicians, as well as poor patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) medical students’ self-perceived knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and educational preferences toward BBN to identify specific curriculum gaps and inform future training requirements.
methodsA cross-sectional analytical study was conducted using a semi-structured online questionnaire distributed to medical students from governmental and private medical schools across six GCC countries. The survey collected data on demographics, BBN knowledge, BBN experiences, self-rated confidence, attitudes, and preferred learning modalities. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Chi-square tests were used to assess associations between categorical variables, and independent sample t-tests were used to compare knowledge levels with mean attitude scores.
resultsA total of 365 students participated. While 62.2% demonstrated good theoretical knowledge about BBN, only 38.6% reported confidence in their general ability to perform it. Half of the participants (49.9%) expressed difficulty in showing empathy, and 34.5% were concerned about explaining diagnoses. Only 17.3% had personally delivered bad news. A significant dissociation was found between the type of exposure and its impact: students who witnessed BBN found it educational (73.1%, p < 0.001), whereas those who personally delivered bad news associated the experience with significant stress (68.7%, p < 0.001). Better theoretical knowledge was significantly associated with a more positive attitude (p = 0.003). Participants expressed a strong preference for active, experiential learning, with 47.7% favoring role-playing with simulated patients and 33.2% preferring exercises with a psychologist.
conclusionThis study reveals a marked gap between theoretical knowledge and practical confidence among GCC medical students. While passive observation is perceived as educational, unguided exposure to delivering bad news is associated with heightened stress. GCC medical curricula should incorporate structured, longitudinal training that prioritizes simulation-based practice and reflective debriefing. These interventions are necessary to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice, ensuring students are competent and psychologically prepared for this professional responsibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.