Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688961›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2026

Psychosocial factors associated with academic performance in medical students: a systematic review.

Raúl Ríos Andrade, Aziel Alejandro Peralta Ramírez, Sergio Trujillo López

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raúl Ríos AndradeDepartamento de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico. raulra3099@gmail.com.
Aziel Alejandro Peralta RamírezDepartamento de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Sergio Trujillo LópezDepartamento de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcademic performance in medical students is influenced by a wide range of psychosocial variables, including emotional distress, motivation, emotional intelligence, and social support. Understanding how these factors relate to academic outcomes is essential for designing effective educational and mental health interventions.

objectiveTo systematically evaluate the association between psychosocial factors and academic performance among medical students and to identify which determinants show the most consistent evidence across studies.

methodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2014 and 2024. Observational studies examining psychosocial factors in relation to academic performance were included. Quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS AND

conclusionsForty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, most of which were cross-sectional. Academic performance was evaluated through GPA/CGPA, examinations, and licensing or OSCE scores. Psychosocial variables assessed included stress, anxiety, depression, motivation, emotional intelligence, resilience, burnout, and social support. Across studies, stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms showed predominantly negative associations with academic performance (reported in 67-80% of articles addressing these constructs), while intrinsic motivation, resilience, emotional intelligence, and perceived social support demonstrated mostly positive associations (60-85% of relevant studies). Some studies reported null findings, reflecting heterogeneity in measures, populations, and outcomes, or a true null effect. Evidence supports consistent associations between psychosocial factors and academic performance among medical students. Stress and negative emotional states are generally linked to poorer outcomes, whereas motivation, social support, emotional intelligence, and resilience tend to predict better performance. The predominance of cross-sectional designs and varied measurement tools precludes causal inference. Strengthening psychosocial resources may help improve both academic success and well-being among medical students.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceStudents, MedicalEmotional IntelligenceHumansMotivationSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalAcademic performanceAcademic stressEmotional intelligenceMedical studentsMotivationPsychosocial factors

Identifiers

PMID41688961
PMCPMC13005307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.