Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688954›Full record

ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Occult cervical large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma masquerading as adenocarcinoma in situ during pregnancy: a case report, literature review, and SEER analysis.

Yifan Hu, Danhui Li, Lihua Qiu, Wen Di

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yifan HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Danhui LiDepartment of Pathology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Lihua QiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. lilyqiulh@126.com.
Wen DiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. diwen163@163.com.

Funding

Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 23JC1403000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the cervix is an uncommon and highly aggressive tumor. Diagnosis during pregnancy is especially difficult because physiological cervical changes and guideline-based restrictions on excisional procedures may limit detection of invasive disease. When LCNEC is concealed beneath surface adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), routine punch biopsies may repeatedly miss stromal invasion, resulting in delayed recognition. Such presentations remain rarely documented and warrant attention due to their potential for rapid progression. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old pregnant woman underwent colposcopy at 20 weeks of gestation for abnormal cervical findings. The first directed punch biopsy demonstrated AIS with high-grade intraepithelial changes. A second colposcopy at 34 weeks showed further enlargement of the visible lesion, yet the repeat punch biopsy again revealed only noninvasive disease. Because excisional diagnosis carries obstetric risks, no excision was performed during pregnancy. After cesarean delivery at 37 weeks, a third colposcopy performed during postpartum cervical involution showed partial resolution of pregnancy-related edema and eversion, although abnormal acetowhite and mosaic patterns persisted. A third postpartum punch biopsy remained noninvasive. Due to persistent discordance between the colposcopic appearance and biopsy results, a diagnostic loop excision was performed at 82 days postpartum. This revealed deeply invasive LCNEC located beneath surface AIS. Staging evaluation showed no residual or metastatic disease. The patient subsequently underwent radical hysterectomy with ovarian preservation and pelvic lymphadenectomy, followed by adjuvant platinum–etoposide chemotherapy, and remains disease-free to date. Review of pregnancy-associated LCNEC cases and population-level survival patterns suggests that earlier diagnosis and definitive treatment are associated with more favorable outcomes, whereas delayed diagnosis or advanced presentation carries markedly poor survival.

conclusionsThis case shows that invasive LCNEC can remain hidden beneath adenocarcinoma in situ during pregnancy, resulting in repeated false-negative biopsies despite progressive clinical findings. In pregnant patients with persistent mismatch between colposcopic impressions and biopsy results, early postpartum excisional evaluation should be considered to avoid missing an aggressive malignancy.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Large CellCarcinoma, NeuroendocrinePregnancy Complications, NeoplasticUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultBiopsyCervix UteriColposcopyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansPregnancyAdenocarcinoma in situCervical cancerLarge cell neuroendocrine carcinomaPregnancySEER database

Identifiers

PMID41688954
PMCPMC13085587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.