ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Occult cervical large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma masquerading as adenocarcinoma in situ during pregnancy: a case report, literature review, and SEER analysis.
Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnosis of Rare Cervical Tumors: IECC Classification, HPV Status, and Subtype-Directed Immunohistochemistry, with Treatment Outcomes from a Tertiary Center.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLarge cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the cervix is an uncommon and highly aggressive tumor. Diagnosis during pregnancy is especially difficult because physiological cervical changes and guideline-based restrictions on excisional procedures may limit detection of invasive disease. When LCNEC is concealed beneath surface adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), routine punch biopsies may repeatedly miss stromal invasion, resulting in delayed recognition. Such presentations remain rarely documented and warrant attention due to their potential for rapid progression. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old pregnant woman underwent colposcopy at 20 weeks of gestation for abnormal cervical findings. The first directed punch biopsy demonstrated AIS with high-grade intraepithelial changes. A second colposcopy at 34 weeks showed further enlargement of the visible lesion, yet the repeat punch biopsy again revealed only noninvasive disease. Because excisional diagnosis carries obstetric risks, no excision was performed during pregnancy. After cesarean delivery at 37 weeks, a third colposcopy performed during postpartum cervical involution showed partial resolution of pregnancy-related edema and eversion, although abnormal acetowhite and mosaic patterns persisted. A third postpartum punch biopsy remained noninvasive. Due to persistent discordance between the colposcopic appearance and biopsy results, a diagnostic loop excision was performed at 82 days postpartum. This revealed deeply invasive LCNEC located beneath surface AIS. Staging evaluation showed no residual or metastatic disease. The patient subsequently underwent radical hysterectomy with ovarian preservation and pelvic lymphadenectomy, followed by adjuvant platinum–etoposide chemotherapy, and remains disease-free to date. Review of pregnancy-associated LCNEC cases and population-level survival patterns suggests that earlier diagnosis and definitive treatment are associated with more favorable outcomes, whereas delayed diagnosis or advanced presentation carries markedly poor survival.
conclusionsThis case shows that invasive LCNEC can remain hidden beneath adenocarcinoma in situ during pregnancy, resulting in repeated false-negative biopsies despite progressive clinical findings. In pregnant patients with persistent mismatch between colposcopic impressions and biopsy results, early postpartum excisional evaluation should be considered to avoid missing an aggressive malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.