Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688852›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2026

Analysis of Participant-Level Characteristics Predicting Adherence to Long-Term EMA and Fitbit Monitoring in the 4HAIE Prospective Cohort Study.

Abigail Lashinsky, Lenka Knapová, Michal Burda, Barbora Kaštovská, Michal Sebera, Denisa Blaschová, Roman Filo, Veronika Uhrová, Melanie Revilla, Steriani Elavsky

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abigail LashinskyDepartment of Health Promotion and Wellness, State University of New York at Oswego, Oswego, United States.
Lenka KnapováDepartment of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Michal BurdaIT4Innovation, Institute for Research and Applications of Fuzzy Modeling, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Barbora KaštovskáDepartment of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Michal SeberaDepartment of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Denisa BlaschováDepartment of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Roman FiloDepartment of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Veronika UhrováDepartment of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Melanie RevillaRECSM, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.
Steriani ElavskyDepartment of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic. steriani.elavsky@osu.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEcological momentary assessment (EMA) and wearable devices provide valuable real-time data on health behaviors, but their utility depends on sustained participant adherence. Limited evidence exists on which individual characteristics predict adherence in long-term, large-scale studies. PURPOSE: This study examined participant-level factors associated with adherence to a 12-month monitoring protocol that combined wearable activity tracking and repeated mobile surveys in a prospective cohort of community-dwelling adults.

methodsA total of 1,314 adults from two regions in the Czech Republic (Moravia-Silesia and South Bohemia) wore a Fitbit activity tracker daily and completed EMA surveys during four two-week bursts across one year. Adherence was operationalized as the number of valid Fitbit monitoring days, completed time-based surveys, and completed weekly surveys. Bidirectional stepwise regression and random forest analyses identified predictors of adherence from demographic, psychological, motivational, and health-related characteristics assessed at baseline.

resultsAdherence was generally high, with participants providing an average of 77% valid Fitbit-days. Older age, lower stress, greater life satisfaction, higher optimism, and stronger barrier self-efficacy predicted greater adherence. Conversely, poorer physical health, higher body mass index, and higher controlled regulation predicted lower adherence.

conclusionsSustained long-term monitoring with mobile surveys and wearables is feasible in large cohorts. Adherence was lower among participants with poorer physical health, higher BMI, and stronger controlled motivation, suggesting that protocols which reduce burden, promote autonomous rather than externally driven motivation, and provide additional support for individuals with health-related barriers may help optimize adherence and data quality.

Indexed as

AdherenceEcological momentary assessment (EMA)FitbitLongitudinal cohort studyWearable devices

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.