Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688839›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2026

Contemporary Role for Blue Light Cystoscopy Across the Bladder Cancer Disease Spectrum.

Ethan Wan, Caroline Wade, Aditya Sathe, James E Ferguson, Charles C Peyton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ethan WanHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3043-6115
Caroline WadeHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9135-3773
Aditya SatheHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1366-0510
James E FergusonHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9073-9615
Charles C PeytonHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. cpeyton@uabmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8778-9759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review aims to synthesize recent evidence and accounts evaluating the utility of blue light cystoscopy (BLC) across the disease spectrum of bladder cancer, including its diagnostic, surveillance, and post-treatment uses, as well as its outpatient applications, economic impact, patient perspectives, and future directions. RECENT

findingsWhile initial studies on BLC suggested an advantage over traditional cystoscopy in terms of diagnostic power and recurrence rates for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, recent studies are more equivocal on its benefits and suggest that the utilization of blue-light cystoscopy is more nuanced. Evidence is lacking on a clear superiority of blue light for all bladder cancer patients. Cost, logistics, and accuracy concerns indicate certain patients may benefit from this procedure more than others. BLC can be a valuable adjunct to white light cystoscopy in the management of bladder cancer. It provides high diagnostic sensitivity but there are questions surrounding its cost-effectiveness, positive predictive value, and its role in effective surveillance and reduction of tumor recurrence require further longitudinal and standardized investigation.

Indexed as

CystoscopyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAminolevulinic AcidBlue LightHumansNon-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsTransurethral Resection of BladderAminolevulinic AcidBladder cancerBlue-light cystoscopyHexaminolevulinatePhotodynamic diagnosisTransurethral resection of bladder tumor

Identifiers

PMID41688839
PMCPMC12904949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.