ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Pro- and Anti-tumorigenic Effects of MSC Secretome in Glioblastoma: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy, glioblastoma remains a lethal condition driven by intrinsic heterogeneity, therapy resistance, and an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and their secretomes, comprising cytokines, growth factors, and extracellular vesicles, have emerged as promising therapeutic candidates due to their tumour-homing properties and anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory potential. However, recent evidence reveals a paradox: MSC secretomes exhibit both anti-inflammatory/immunomodulatory potential and pro-tumorigenic activities, depending on MSC source, passage number, and environmental and manufacturing contexts. In this review, we critically examine the molecular mechanisms underlying these opposing effects, synthesising evidence on how MSC source, donor variability, passage number, and environmental priming/licensing (e.g., hypoxia, inflammatory licensing) dictate secretome composition and function. We identify critical manufacturing determinants, including the necessity for upper passage limits and standardised isolation protocols, and propose a translational framework that integrates mechanism-based potency assays, such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) reporter systems and multi-donor mixed lymphocyte reactions, to predict clinical activity. Establishing these robust quality controls and mechanistic release and rejection criteria will be essential to resolve the functional plasticity of secretomes and enable the safe translation of MSC-based therapies for glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.