ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2026
Identifying Mouse Undifferentiated To Differentiated Spermatogonia Stem Cells at the Single-Cell Level Using Machine Learning Approaches.
Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mouse spermatogenesis is a highly orchestrated process, yet the transcriptional and molecular heterogeneity of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) remains incompletely understood. Leveraging multi-omics integration and machine learning, we aimed to characterize SSC subtypes, identify key regulatory genes, and uncover novel biomarkers associated with spermatogenic function and stemness. We systematically retrieved and curated four mouse gene expression datasets from GEO (GSE45887, GSE45885, GSE9210, and validation set GSE145467), applying rigorous preprocessing, normalization, and batch effect correction using R/Bioconductor tools. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using the Limma package (FDR < 0.01, |log₂FC| > 1.5), followed by GO and KEGG enrichment analyses via Enrichr. Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) and a stemness index (mRNAsi) based on the OCLR algorithm were computed. Key hub genes were validated using scRNA-seq data (GSE149512) and further assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and biomarker selection via recursive feature elimination (RFE). Integration of multi-dataset transcriptomic profiles revealed a conserved set of DEGs involved in stemness, germ cell development, and metabolic regulation. Hierarchical clustering and GSVA distinguished distinct SSC subtypes, with enrichment in hallmark and KEGG pathways linked to glycolysis, cell cycle regulation, and pluripotency. Single-cell analyses confirmed expression of key SSC markers (e.g., CD9, ID4, THY1), while SIMPA-based imputation of single-cell ChIP-seq data validated epigenetic occupancy patterns. Machine learning models (Random Forest, SVM, ANN) achieved high classification performance (AUC > 0.92) in predicting SSC phenotypes from transcriptomic and IHC data. IHC validation in mouse testicular tissues further corroborated spatial localization of hub genes. Our integrative transcriptomic and single-cell approach uncovers the molecular landscape of mouse SSCs, identifies robust biomarkers of spermatogenic function, and presents a computational pipeline for SSC characterization. These findings offer critical insights for reproductive medicine and potential therapeutic applications in male infertility and regenerative biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41688827What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.