ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Surgical treatment of patients with secondary brain abscess after emergency craniotomy in adults: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although advancements have been made in the diagnosis and management of brain abscesses, associated morbidity and mortality remain substantial. Secondary brain abscesses following emergency craniotomy may aggravate primary brain injury and lead to increased disability and complications. This single-center retrospective study evaluated adult patients diagnosed with secondary brain abscesses between June 2015 and June 2025. A total of 47 patients were included, with a mean age of 54.6 ± 15.1 years, and 35 patients (74.5%) were male. All patients had a history of intracerebral hemorrhage (55.3%) or traumatic brain injury (44.7%) and underwent emergency craniotomy. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) were performed in all cases. The most common clinical manifestations were fever (42.6%), headache (36.2%), and cognitive impairment (19.1%), while focal neurological deficits such as hemiplegia were frequently observed due to the primary injury. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score improved significantly from 11.7 ± 2.0 before treatment to 13.2 ± 1.5 after treatment. According to the Glasgow Outcome Scale at discharge, 44 patients (93.6%) achieved good outcomes, whereas 3 patients (6.4%) had poor outcomes. Lower GCS scores at presentation were associated with unfavorable prognosis. Timely surgical intervention combined with targeted antimicrobial therapy effectively controlled infection and reduced the risk of permanent neurological deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41688804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.