ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Temporal dynamics of effort discounting: The roles of cognitive load and depression.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effort discounting, or the devaluation of rewards requiring effort, depends on underlying neural computations of reward valuation and cognitive control. Although much is known about effort discounting, its temporal dynamics-how effort valuation changes when required effort is delayed-remain underexplored. Furthermore, although depression has been linked to altered effort and reward discounting, its role in the temporal dynamics of effort valuation remains unclear. In this study, we conducted three experiments to examine how temporal delays alter effort aversion, with a focus on cognitive load and individual differences in depression. In Experiment 1, we evaluated effort valuation by using the Cognitive Effort Discounting (COG-ED) paradigm together with a backward-typing task and found that effort discounting decreases over time for tasks that require high effort. Experiment 2 replicated this pattern by using a working memory (n-back) task, confirming that effort demand modulates temporal effort discounting for high cognitive loads. Experiment 3 investigated whether depressive traits modulate temporal effort discounting. Nondepressed participants showed strong effects of delay at higher effort levels, with effort discounting decreasing over time. In contrast, depressed participants exhibited reduced sensitivity to delay. Hierarchical drift diffusion modeling (HDDM) revealed that nondepressed individuals flexibly adjusted their decision-making by shifting from positive (high-effort) to negative (low-effort) drift rates as effort increased. In contrast, depressed individuals exhibited consistently negative drift rates across all effort levels, indicating a persistent bias toward effort avoidance. Taken together, these findings highlight how cognitive load influences effort valuation over time and suggest that depression blunts temporal sensitivity in effort-based decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.