ArticlePsychological research2026
Guiding gaze via gaze: Effect anticipation during intentional saccadic gaze leading.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our actions often evoke foreseeable behavioral responses in others. For instance, fixating an object can trigger another person to look toward the same location. Ideomotor frameworks assume that one's own actions are initiated by anticipating this evoked behavior of another person. However, in gaze leading situations, a partner’s gaze following is initially discernible only peripherally, raising the question of whether corresponding anticipations still affect the gaze leader’s eye movements. This potentially important mechanism underlying gaze interaction has not yet been explicitly examined. We conducted two experiments using a novel adaptation of the response-effect compatibility (REC) paradigm. Within a card-game cheating scenario, participants performed a saccade to one of two target objects (card decks). Contingent upon this saccade, an on-screen face foreseeably looked to the same object (compatible) or to the opposite side (incompatible), a perceptual consequence of the participant’s saccade that was initially only detectable in peripheral vision. Crucially, participants initiated saccades significantly faster in the compatible compared to the incompatible condition, but only in an experimental setting without additional constraints preventing direct fixation of the action effect. This suggests that participants anticipated their (virtual) partner’s gaze responses, which in turn either facilitated or hampered the production of their own eye movements. This finding aligns with the idea that basic ideomotor processes also underlie social gaze leading/following scenarios. Consistent with previous REC studies in the non-social domain, the results also indicate that the effect is sensitive to specific experimental settings and may disappear when cognitive demands are too high or when the interaction situation is less realistic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.