Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688767›Full record

ReviewTransgenic research2026

The emerging impact of CRISPR and gene editing on global crop improvement.

M Mansi, Priyanka Danai

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Transgenic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M MansiFaculty of Sciences, Motherhood University, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, 247661, India.
Priyanka DanaiFaculty of Sciences, Motherhood University, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, 247661, India. priyankadanaimhu@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of CRISPR-based genome editing has revolutionized crop improvement, offering unprecedented precision and efficiency in modifying key agronomic traits. This review comprehensively examines the mechanisms, applications, and future potential of CRISPR technology in enhancing global crop production. CRISPR-Cas systems, originally identified as adaptive immune mechanisms in bacteria and archaea, have been repurposed for targeted genome editing in plants. The CRISPR-Cas9 system, in particular, has emerged as a powerful tool for introducing site-specific double-strand breaks, enabling precise genetic modifications. The three-stage process of adaptation, expression, and interference underlies the CRISPR mechanism, with guide RNAs directing Cas endonucleases to specific genomic loci. Advances in CRISPR technology have expanded its applications beyond gene knockouts, encompassing base editing, prime editing, and epigenome editing. These innovations have facilitated the development of crops with enhanced yield, stress tolerance, disease resistance, nutritional content, and post-harvest quality. However, challenges related to off-target effects, regulatory hurdles, ethical concerns, and public acceptance must be addressed to fully harness the potential of CRISPR in agriculture. Integration of CRISPR with other cutting-edge technologies, such as synthetic biology, artificial intelligence, and high-throughput phenotyping, holds immense promise for accelerating crop improvement efforts. As research continues to refine CRISPR tools and expand their applicability across diverse plant species, this transformative technology is poised to play a pivotal role in shaping a sustainable, resilient, and productive global food system for future generations.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsCrops, AgriculturalGene EditingPlants, Genetically ModifiedEpigenome EditingGenome, PlantCRISPRCrop improvementDisease resistanceGene editingNutritional qualityStress tolerance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.