ArticleScientific reports2026
Revisiting our primate roots in infants grooming.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grooming is a common behavior across many animal species, including non-human primates (NHP), and serves a variety of functions, such as cleaning hair, alleviating stress, and enhancing social bonds. This study aims to explore whether grooming-like behaviors are present in humans during early developmental stages, before the emergence of gestural and language communication. Through the observations of 67 preverbal infants, we identified frequent manual behaviors, including grasping, holding, and behaviors resembling grooming, particularly directed toward caregivers’ hairy skin. These behaviors were analyzed and validated by twelve independent primatologists, who confirmed that behavioral sequences and their kinematics closely resembled grooming behaviors seen in NHPs, while also distinguishing them from other types of manual actions such as holding or grasping. Longitudinal analyses demonstrated a significant reduction in infants’ grooming behaviors beginning at 8 months, with these behaviors no longer observed by 15 months, a developmental shift that coincided with the emergence of more sophisticated gestural communication. Interestingly, grooming frequency, but not other actions, peaked during a specific time window, between 2pm and 4pm, which corresponds with a well-documented circadian dip in beta-endorphins, a neurochemical associated with stress regulation and social bonding. This alignment points toward a potential physiological underpinning for the timing of these behaviors. These findings suggest that infant grooming behavior represents a vestigial motor pattern, likely reflecting conserved evolutionary mechanisms shared with non-human primates. This behavior may represent a primitive form of early social interaction, highlighting the role of ancient motor programs in shaping prelinguistic communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.