ArticleScientific reports2026
Everyday discrimination among middle-aged and older adults in India: a multilevel cross-sectional analysis from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Everyday discrimination (ED) has adverse effects on health and well-being. This study highlights understudied trends in the distribution, correlates, and geographic variation of ED among Indian adults aged 45 and above. The analysis of 61,722 participants in the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (2017-18) revealed significant state/union territory (UT)-level variation. While Nagaland, Tripura, Mizoram, and Lakshadweep had comparatively lower ED scores than the national average, Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi, Chhattisgarh, and Karnataka had higher scores. Additionally, using multilevel negative binomial regression, we found that men, non-married adults, migrant residents, and adults in rural areas had higher ED rates. In general, with increases in education level and household monthly per capita income, there was a reduction in ED rates. Notably, adults with a functional disability (Incident Rate Ratio (IRR) = 1.43 [95% confidence interval: 1.32, 1.55]) and physical or mental impairment (IRR = 2.15 [1.88, 2.45]) had significantly higher ED rates than those without. We also partitioned the geographic variation in ED and found that more geographic variance was explained by the community (village/ward) level than by the state/UT level, accounting for roughly 60% and 40% of the variation across models, respectively. Our findings suggest that community-based contextual factors necessitate further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.