ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessing entrepreneurial transformation in agricultural universities using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agriculture has received relatively limited attention in entrepreneurship research compared to other sectors. This study seeks to identify effective strategies for fostering agricultural entrepreneurship within universities. The research was conducted in three stages and involved interviews with 140 key informants. Using an integrated methodology that combines the Fuzzy Delphi Method Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution the study identified ten macro-policies and fifty-one specific strategies. Among these, the reward and support system emerged as the highest-ranking macro-policy. Strategies such as recognizing and promoting entrepreneurial faculty and encouraging experiential learning were ranked first and second, respectively. The second most critical policy involved the role of intermediary institutions and stakeholder engagement, followed by governance, leadership, and human resource management as the third. The findings underscore existing gaps in the development of effective strategies and provide actionable insights for policymakers seeking to enhance academic entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.