Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688645›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

How to optimally allocate sampling effort in experimental ecology.

Andreas H Schweiger, Aron Garthen, Michael Bahn, David Chalcraft, Nicolas Schtickzelle, Klaus Steenberg Larsen, Jürgen Kreyling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreas H SchweigerInstitute of Landscape and Plant Ecology, Department of Plant Ecology, University of Hohenheim, Ottilie-Zeller-Weg 2, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany. andreas.schweiger@uni-hohenheim.de.
Aron GarthenExperimental Plant Ecology, Institute for Botany and Landscape Ecology, Greifswald University, Soldmannstraße 15, D-17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Michael BahnInstitute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestr. 15, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.
David ChalcraftDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA.
Nicolas SchtickzelleEarth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Croix du sud 4/L7.07.04, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, Belgium.
Klaus Steenberg LarsenDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, Frederiksberg C, 1958, Denmark.
Jürgen KreylingExperimental Plant Ecology, Institute for Botany and Landscape Ecology, Greifswald University, Soldmannstraße 15, D-17487, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major aim of experimental ecology is to quantify responses to environmental change. Study designs which optimally capture response patterns are currently debated. A key point in the discussion is how a limited total number of samples should ideally be allocated to replication versus the number of locations along the environmental gradient. Here, we assess how to optimally allocate sampling effort for maximizing prediction accuracy in gradient designs. For this we performed artificial data simulations for different sampling approaches with or without a priori knowledge of the underlying patterns, and applied a set of commonly observed response shapes. Overall, unreplicated sampling with equidistant, systematic placement along the gradient of interest at as many locations or levels as affordable turned out to be the best approach for unknown response shapes. Replication was found to be beneficial when a priori knowledge exists about the underlying, simple (e.g. linear or humped) response shape.

Indexed as

EcologyResearch DesignComputer SimulationEcosystemEcological modelsExperimental designGlobal change experimentsNon-linear responsesPolynomial fitsPrediction success

Identifiers

PMID41688645
PMCPMC12910100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.