Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688640›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Graph neural network surrogates to leverage mechanistic expert knowledge towards reliable and immediate pandemic response.

Agatha Schmidt, Henrik Zunker, Alexander Heinlein, Martin J Kühn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agatha Schmidt *Department of High-Performance Computing, Institute of Software Technology, German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5766-8804
Henrik Zunker *Department of High-Performance Computing, Institute of Software Technology, German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9825-365X
Alexander HeinleinDelft University of Technology, Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1578-8104
Martin J KühnDepartment of High-Performance Computing, Institute of Software Technology, German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany. martin.kuehn@dlr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0906-6984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 crisis, mechanistic models have guided evidence-based decision making. However, time-critical decisions in a dynamical environment limit the time available to gather supporting evidence. We address this bottleneck by developing a graph neural network (GNN) surrogate of an age-structured and spatially resolved mechanistic metapopulation simulation model. This combined approach complements classical modeling approaches which are mostly mechanistic and purely data-driven machine learning approaches which are often black box. Our design of experiments spans outbreak and persistent-threat regimes, up to three contact change points, and age-structured contact matrices on a spatial graph with 400 nodes representing German counties. We benchmark multiple GNN layers and identify an ARMAConv-based architecture that offers a strong accuracy–runtime trade-off. Across horizons of 30–90 day simulation and prediction, allowing up to three contact change points, the surrogate model attains 10–27% mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) while delivering (near) constant runtime with respect to the forecast horizon. Our approach accelerates evaluation by up to 28 670 times compared with the mechanistic model, allowing responsive decision support in time-critical scenarios and straightforward web integration. These results show how GNN surrogates can translate complex metapopulation models into immediate, reliable tools for pandemic response.

Indexed as

COVID-19Graph Neural NetworksPandemicsComputer SimulationGermanyHumansSARS-CoV-2Epidemic simulationGraph neural networksHigh-performance computingMetapopulationSpatio-temporal forecastingSurrogate modeling

Identifiers

PMID41688640
PMCPMC12904856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.