ArticleScientific reports2026
Legume cover crops ameliorate soil acidity and enhance nutrient availability in South African sugarcane fields.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sugarcane is a drought-sensitive crop that is particularly vulnerable during the vegetative growth stage under rainfed conditions. The study aimed to investigate how climate influences soil nutrients, pH, and exchangeable acidity (EA) in South African sugarcane plantations, and evaluated soil responses to selected legume species. We evaluated six legume species, namely, Arachis hypogaea, Cajanus cajan, Mucuna pruriens, Vicia sativa, Vicia villosa, and Vigna unguiculata. Random forests (RF) were used to capture the relationships between soil nutrients and site, total precipitation (TP) and elevation. Random Forest models revealed strong predictive power for primary (P, N, K) and secondary (Ca, Mg) nutrients, with site, TP, and elevation as key predictors. EA was well predicted (90.4%), while pH showed lower predictability of 30.7%. Site, precipitation and elevation consistently emerged as dominant drivers of soil variability. Mixed-effects models showed that legumes reduced soil N, P, and K, with Vigna unguiculata having the strongest effect on N and P, and Arachis hypogaea on K. In contrast, soil Ca and Mg were increased by four of the six legumes, notably Vicia villosa and Vicia sativa. An inverse relationship between pH and EA was observed, with EA being 67% lower in KwaZulu-Natal Coastal Belt Grassland than in Maputaland Coastal Belt. Exchangeable acidity was reduced in legume-planted soils compared to pre-treatment soils (0.227 cmol/L), with decreases of 51.0% in Vicia sativa and 51.1% in Vicia villosa. Soil pH increased from 4.94 before planting soils to 5.22 to 6.24 under legumes, corresponding to a 6 to 26% increase, with the largest increase observed under Mucuna pruriens (26%). Based on soil responses and climate resilience, we recommend Vicia sativa as a promising legume to enhance soil fertility and pH under changing climatic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.