Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688604›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Single-cell mass-density measurements using microchannel gradient centrifugation.

Richard Soller, Per Augustsson, Rune Barnkob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard SollerLund University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund, 22363, Sweden.
Per AugustssonLund University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund, 22363, Sweden. per.augustsson@bme.lth.se.
Rune BarnkobLund University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund, 22363, Sweden. rune@barnkob.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a microchannel-based adaptation of mass density-gradient centrifugation for the mass density measurement of cells or microparticles. The workflow consists of three basic steps: Microchannel filling, centrifugation, and microscopy. Microchannel filling and subsequent centrifugation of two liquids with different densities allows the instantaneous, precise, and repeatable generation of a one-dimensional mass-density gradient and the simultaneous sedimentation of cells or particles of interest to a point where their mass density is equal to the gradient's mass density. We introduce two different methods, calibration particles and tracer molecules, for microscopic mass density readout. We demonstrate the measurement principle by measuring the mass density of yeast cells and show that the method allows the mass density measurement of single cells with a position dependent median uncertainty of 3.3 [Formula: see text] with a throughput of approximately 16000 cells per hour. This measurement precision is in the range of the best single-cell methods currently in use but with a higher throughput. The method is technically straightforward, robust, and affordable, making single-cell mass density measurements widely available.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesSingle-Cell AnalysisCentrifugation, Density GradientSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID41688604
PMCPMC12909970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.