ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Within-visit and short- and long-term between-visit blood pressure variability as predictors of cardiovascular events and mortality in elderly Chinese.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the prognostic value of within-visit and short- and long-term between-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and incident atrial fibrillation in an elderly Chinese population. Participants were elderly (≥65 years) inhabitants, enrolled in a trial for atrial fibrillation screening. Blood pressure was measured three times consecutively at baseline and in a subset also at least two weekly visits during the first month of follow-up or at least two quarterly visits during the first year of follow-up. BPV indices included standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and other statistical measures. We computed hazard ratios (HR) for the risks of clinical outcomes associated with a 1-SD increase in these BPV indices, while accounting for confounding factors. Among 6711 participants, diastolic within-visit BPV indices were significantly (P ≤ 0.02) and positively associated with the risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, but systolic BPV indices were negatively associated with the risk of incident atrial fibrillation (HRs 1.03-1.09 and 0.87-0.92, respectively). Among 362 participants, none of the short-term between-visit BPV indices were associated with the clinical outcomes (P ≥ 0.09). For the long-term between-visit BPV among 1582 participants, significant associations were observed for systolic BPV indices in relation to cardiovascular mortality (P ≥ 0.03), and diastolic BPV indices in relation to incident atrial fibrillation (P ≤ 0.03), with the HRs ranging from 1.05-1.43, and from 1.07-1.20, respectively. In conclusion, some of the BPV indices were weakly associated with the risk of mortality, cardiovascular events and incident atrial fibrillation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41688591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.