Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688583›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Distinguishing between the exponential and Lindley distributions: An illustration from biological psychology.

Shovan Chowdhury, Marco Marozzi, Freddy Hernández-Barajas, Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shovan ChowdhuryDecision Sciences and Operations Management, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Marco MarozziDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-0955
Freddy Hernández-BarajasDepartment of Statistics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia.
Fernando Marmolejo-RamosCollege of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. fernando.marmolejoramos@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4680-1287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exponential distribution has been used for modeling positively skewed data in biological psychology. However, the lesser-known Lindley distribution, although not typically used for this purpose, has a density and cumulative distribution that are very similar to those of the exponential distribution. This similarity suggests that the Lindley distribution could be a strong candidate for modeling such data types. While the probability density and cumulative distribution functions of these two one-parameter distributions can be quite similar, their hazard rate functions differ markedly. Therefore, selecting the most appropriate distribution significantly impacts the interpretation of the hazard rate function. To aid in this selection, we introduce a method that distinguishes between the exponential and Lindley distributions by examining the ratio of their maximized likelihood functions. This method is versatile, as it can also be applied to type I censored data, enhancing its practical appeal. Asymptotic results are analytically derived. We conducted a simulation study to demonstrate the method's effectiveness, even with small sample sizes. Furthermore, we illustrate the method's application using a published dataset from biological psychology and provide an implementation as an R function.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalStatistical DistributionsComputer SimulationHumansLikelihood FunctionsCensored dataDistributional regressionExponential distributionHazard rate functionLikelihood-ratio testLindley distribution

Identifiers

PMID41688583
PMCPMC12904947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.