ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026
Randomized controlled trial of a video-based educational platform prior to in-person vasectomy consult.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a randomized-control trial to assess the impact of a video-based educational platform (VEP) on the pre-consult knowledge and post-consult satisfaction of patients presenting for vasectomy consultation. Between December 2022-2023, 39 patients were randomized on an alternating basis to receive either access to a VEP before their vasectomy consult (n = 18) or an in-person consult only (n = 21)(standard of care [SOC]). The VEP was created in partnership with EngagedMD, and consisted of 6 videos (total of 7 min) with mandatory checkpoint questions. A 10-question assessment was given prior to the start of the vasectomy consultation, and custom Likert-scale surveys were given after the consultation. Age, level of education, and marital status were not statistically different between the groups. The VEP group scored higher on the baseline knowledge assessment compared to the SOC group (90% vs 60%, p = <0.001). 100% of patients agreed the VEP helped educate them on the risks and benefits of vasectomy. 94.1% of patients endorsed that the VEP enhanced their ability to converse with the medical team. Compared to the SOC group, the VEP group had higher median composite survey scores regarding comfort with procedure decision-making, clinical expectations, and overall care satisfaction (34 vs 31, p = 0.004).
Identifiers
41688563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.