Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688561›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhancing digital mapping of soil organic carbon through spatial modeling and validation.

Azam Jafari, Fereydoon Sarmadian, Ahmad Heidari, Zahra Rasaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Azam JafariSoil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Fereydoon SarmadianSoil Science Department, Faculty of Agricultural, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. fsarmad@ut.ac.ir.
Ahmad HeidariSoil Science Department, Faculty of Agricultural, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
Zahra RasaeiSoil Science Department, Faculty of Agricultural, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is a key indicator of soil health, stability, and security, and a major component of global carbon sequestration. Accurate SOC modeling is vital for environmental management and climate change mitigation. Despite machine learning advances, spatial autocorrelation remains a challenge in SOC prediction. This study assesses its impact by comparing four Random Forest (RF) models at 0–30 cm soil depth: (1) classic RF with non-spatial variables and random cross-validation, (2) classic RF with spatial and non-spatial variables and random cross-validation, (3) classic RF with non-spatial variables and spatial cross-validation, and (4) spatial RF with non-spatial variables and random cross-validation. Using 281 soil samples collected over six years in Abyek, Iran, the study integrates spatial and non-spatial predictors, including topographic, climatic, and vegetation indices. Scenario 4 yields the highest predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.86, RMSE = 0.11) and eliminates spatial autocorrelation in residuals (Moran’s I = -0.01, p = 0.82). In contrast, models lacking spatial components (e.g., Scenario 1) show residual clustering and biased predictions (Moran’s I > 0.15, p < 0.001). These results highlight the importance of incorporating spatial dependencies and proper validation to enhance SOC prediction. The study informs digital soil mapping, carbon stock assessment, and land management for sustainable agriculture.

Indexed as

Digital soil mappingSoil spatial variabilitySpatial autocorrelationSpatial cross-validationSpatial machine learning

Identifiers

PMID41688561
PMCPMC12982607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.