ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning for predicting CKD stages in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a nationwide cohort study in Japan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is a valuable tool in healthcare, enabling the prediction of disease progression through data-driven regression and nonlinear modeling. Unlike traditional statistical methods, ML can identify complex interactions among explanatory variables. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a common cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD), often progressing to end-stage renal failure. Accurately predicting CKD progression in ADPKD patients is essential for personalized treatment strategies. This study analyzed data from 2,737 patients with ADPKD enrolled in the Japanese Nationwide Cohort. Using this dataset, we developed ML models to predict CKD stages. Feature importance analysis was performed to identify key predictive variables. Three ML models—random forest, support vector machine, and naïve Bayes—were evaluated for their predictive accuracy. Random forest exhibited the highest predictive accuracy among the models tested. Feature importance analysis identified estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine, CKD heat map, urinary protein, and total kidney volume as the most significant predictors of CKD stage. As a nonlinear model, random forest effectively captured complex interactions between variables, outperforming the linear support vector machine. The naïve Bayes model, despite assuming independence among variables, surpassed the linear model, indicating limited interdependence among some predictors. ML, particularly random forest, provides a robust approach for predicting CKD stages in patients with ADPKD by accounting for nonlinear variable relationships. These findings emphasize ML’s potential in personalized CKD management and highlight the need for individualized treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.