ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-criteria selection of a synchronisation word for low-power IoT receivers based on the IQRF standard.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study focuses on identifying an optimised synchronisation word based on multiple practical criteria for wireless internet-of-things systems, where reliable and energy-efficient synchronisation is essential to extend battery life by reducing unnecessary receiver activations (wake-ups) and false detections. To address the limitations of purely theoretical designs, a weighted multi-criteria evaluation framework is presented specifically tailored for resource-constrained receivers (e.g., IQRF). A mathematical receiver model utilising a correlation detector operating in additive white Gaussian noise is formulated, and the effects of synchronisation-word selection on detectability and the rate of false detections are analytically determined for both fixed alignment and sliding-window search methods. The methodology is augmented by laboratory measurements conducted on a pair of parallel Texas Instruments receivers. The resulting data are compared with theoretical expectations, and both agreements and discrepancies are analysed in terms of their underlying causes and system-level implications. The results yield practical design recommendations for low-power wireless internet-of-things devices, including recommendations on bit balance, suppression of aperiodic autocorrelation sidelobes, robustness to cyclic shifts, and diminished cross-correlation with recurring traffic patterns, demonstrating that the proposed framework identifies synchronisation words that reduce false alarms by orders of magnitude compared to standard baselines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.