ArticleScientific reports2026
Harvesting insights: interpretable machine learning to understand environmental drivers of U.S. maize and soybean yield.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multi-source remote sensing and machine learning framework for maize mapping and yield estimation in fragmented Loess gully regions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate crop yield prediction is crucial for enhancing food security and agricultural sustainability; however, existing models frequently struggle to capture the intricate relationships between environmental drivers and crop performance. Here we leveraged a large, spatially explicit yield monitor dataset of U.S. commercial maize (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) fields (134 unique crop-site-years). Machine learning models were trained to predict yield with high accuracy (R2 > 0.87, RMSE < 1.13 Mg ha−1), and Shapley Additive Explanations were used to quantify how weather, soil, and terrain properties predict yield variability. Our results highlight the potential of machine learning to disentangle environmental constraints on crop production, thereby providing actionable insights for more resilient U.S. food systems. The results presented here represent a novel approach to identifying maize and soybean yield constraints that can inform the next generation of crop breeding and precision management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.