Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688522›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Harvesting insights: interpretable machine learning to understand environmental drivers of U.S. maize and soybean yield.

Harrison W Smith, Christopher J Heffernan, Amanda J Ashworth, L Lanier Nalley, David S Bullock, Jason Tullis, Phillip R Owens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Harrison W SmithEnvironmental Dynamics Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA. hws001@uark.edu.
Christopher J HeffernanDepartment of Computer Science and Computer Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Amanda J AshworthUSDA-ARS Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
L Lanier NalleyAgricultural Economics and Agribusiness Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
David S BullockDepartment of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Jason TullisDepartment of Geosciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Phillip R OwensUSDA-ARS Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center, Booneville, AR, USA.

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2023-67011-40361Natural Resources Conservation Service NR213A7500013G021USDA-NIFA Hatch Project 470-362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate crop yield prediction is crucial for enhancing food security and agricultural sustainability; however, existing models frequently struggle to capture the intricate relationships between environmental drivers and crop performance. Here we leveraged a large, spatially explicit yield monitor dataset of U.S. commercial maize (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) fields (134 unique crop-site-years). Machine learning models were trained to predict yield with high accuracy (R2 > 0.87, RMSE < 1.13 Mg ha−1), and Shapley Additive Explanations were used to quantify how weather, soil, and terrain properties predict yield variability. Our results highlight the potential of machine learning to disentangle environmental constraints on crop production, thereby providing actionable insights for more resilient U.S. food systems. The results presented here represent a novel approach to identifying maize and soybean yield constraints that can inform the next generation of crop breeding and precision management strategies.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGlycine maxMachine LearningZea maysAgricultureEnvironmentPredictive Learning ModelsSoilUnited StatesWeatherSoil

Identifiers

PMID41688522
PMCPMC12992539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.