Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688520›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Drying kinetics, power consumption, economic and environmental analysis of pomegranate peels drying using a hybrid solar dryer compared with oven dryer.

Khaled A Metwally, El-Sayed G Khater, Adel H Bahnasawy, Aml Abubakr Tantawy, Ahmed Elbeltagi, Ali Salem, Samy A Marey, Abdelaziz M Okasha, Khaled Abdeen Mousa Ali, Abdallah Elshawadfy Elwakeel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Khaled A MetwallySoil and Water Sciences Department, Faculty of Technology and Development, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt.
El-Sayed G KhaterAgricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, P.O. Box 13736, Moshtohor, Toukh, Kalubia, Egypt.
Adel H BahnasawyAgricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, P.O. Box 13736, Moshtohor, Toukh, Kalubia, Egypt.
Aml Abubakr TantawyFood Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 65211, Egypt.
Ahmed ElbeltagiAgricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Ali SalemCivil Engineering Department, Minia University, Minia, Egypt. salem.ali@mik.pte.hu.
Samy A MareyDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdelaziz M OkashaDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, 33516, Egypt.
Khaled Abdeen Mousa AliCollege of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Abdallah Elshawadfy ElwakeelAgricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt. abdallah_elshawadfy@agr.aswu.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drying pomegranate peels, a by-product of juice production, preserves their beneficial properties and minimizes waste. Using optimal drying conditions, such as controlled temperatures and thin layers, improves efficiency and ensures high quality. These dried peels can then be utilized in various industries, including food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. To our knowledge, there are no existing studies that detail the effects of hybrid solar drying, drying temperatures, and layer thickness on the drying kinetics, power consumption, and economic and environmental aspects. In this study, a hybrid indirect SD (HISD) with a temperature and humidity control unit was used to dry pomegranate peels at three different temperatures-50 °C, 60 °C, and 70 °C-and three different thicknesses-1, 2, and 3 cm. The HISD was then compared to a conventional oven drying system (CODS). The obtained results indicated that increasing the drying temperature increased the weight loss of pomegranate peels. Also, the average initial moisture content of pomegranate peels was 76.5% (w.b.). The final MC ranged from 2.67 to 2.10% and from 2.97 to 2.84% for the CODS and HISD, respectively. The higher drying rates of the pomegranate peels dried using CODS and HISD were 169.79 and 196 kg

Indexed as

DesiccationFood HandlingFruitPomegranateFood, ProcessedKineticsTemperatureCarbon footprintCarbon mitigationHealthy foodsPostharvest technologyRenewable energySuitability

Identifiers

PMID41688520
PMCPMC12929600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.