ArticleScientific reports2026
Drying kinetics, power consumption, economic and environmental analysis of pomegranate peels drying using a hybrid solar dryer compared with oven dryer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drying pomegranate peels, a by-product of juice production, preserves their beneficial properties and minimizes waste. Using optimal drying conditions, such as controlled temperatures and thin layers, improves efficiency and ensures high quality. These dried peels can then be utilized in various industries, including food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. To our knowledge, there are no existing studies that detail the effects of hybrid solar drying, drying temperatures, and layer thickness on the drying kinetics, power consumption, and economic and environmental aspects. In this study, a hybrid indirect SD (HISD) with a temperature and humidity control unit was used to dry pomegranate peels at three different temperatures-50 °C, 60 °C, and 70 °C-and three different thicknesses-1, 2, and 3 cm. The HISD was then compared to a conventional oven drying system (CODS). The obtained results indicated that increasing the drying temperature increased the weight loss of pomegranate peels. Also, the average initial moisture content of pomegranate peels was 76.5% (w.b.). The final MC ranged from 2.67 to 2.10% and from 2.97 to 2.84% for the CODS and HISD, respectively. The higher drying rates of the pomegranate peels dried using CODS and HISD were 169.79 and 196 kg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.