ArticleScientific reports2026
Biogeographic variation in the diet of juvenile blacktip sharks across the Galapagos Archipelago.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Juvenile blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) are highly abundant in the mangrove-fringed bays throughout the Galapagos Archipelago, utilizing these habitats as nursery grounds. Due to spatial variation in factors including temperature and larval connectivity, fish species richness is higher in the eastern portion of the archipelago. Predator diets often reflect regional prey availability, leading us to hypothesize that juvenile blacktip sharks in the eastern Galapagos would have greater prey taxa richness than those in the west. Here, we used DNA metabarcoding of fecal matter collected via non-lethal cloacal swabs to describe and quantify juvenile blacktip shark diets. We collected samples from 107 sharks across 240 km, spanning 14 bays on four islands, and released all sharks alive. The most common prey taxa identified were Thoburn's mullet (Mugil thoburni; 20.0%, based on percent of occurrence), followed by fishes in the genus Abudefduf (sergeant-majors; 13.4%), Galapagos ringtail damselfish (Stegastes beebei; 12.7%), scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini; 11.7%), and yellowtail damselfish (Stegastes arcifrons; 10.7%). Prey taxa richness was highest among sharks sampled in the bays of San Cristobal, possibly due to geographic variation in prey availability. Additionally, sharks sampled during a La Niña event in 2021 had higher prey taxa richness than those sampled during an El Niño event in 2023, which could be due to El Niño-induced declines in species richness and abundance resulting from shifts in primary productivity and upwelling. A deeper understanding of shark diets can improve our ability to predict how changes in food web dynamics and prey availability affect shark populations. This knowledge is especially vital in the face of overfishing and climate change, helping to inform more effective conservation strategies and support shark survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.