ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparing ecological relevance of climate velocity indices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate change is causing species ranges to shift. Population survival requires species to shift at a sufficient pace to accommodate with climate. However, estimating the velocity of climate change requires an assumption about its direction. This can be done via two alternative methods: the gradient-based methods and the recently introduced Monte-cArlo iTerative Convergence metHod (MATCH). In this work, we investigate how the rates of North-American birds and marine species range shifts correspond to the velocity of climate change (in the latitude, longitude and elevation/depth direction) calculated using either of these methods. These velocities are evaluated against the centroid of each considered species’ observed distribution range, based on the Audubon Christmas Bird Count and the NOAA Global Marine Data databases. We find that the MATCH method better describes the observed latitudinal and elevation/depth range shifts of the species, which is twice the Gradient performance. Developing robust method to evaluate the velocity of species could help in the planning of assisted migration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.