ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative gut microbiome analysis of Rohu fish from Halda River and Kaptai Lake using 16S rRNA sequencing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of water prophylaxis and biosafety in finfish aquaculture - current and emerging technologies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems are vital for biodiversity and livelihoods in Bangladesh, where interest in fish gut microbiota is growing to aid aquaculture sustainability through microbial interventions. Therefore, this research investigated the bacteriomes of the gut of Rohu from the Halda River and Kaptai Lake, using Oxford Nanopore long-read 16S rRNA sequencing. The evaluation of diversity demonstrated notable variations in both alpha and beta diversity indices (p < 0.05). The fish in the Halda River had a varied bacteriome, mostly composed of Pirellulaceae_uncultured (9.26%), with environmentally tolerant taxa such as Exiguobacterium (5.48%). In contrast, the Kaptai Lake fish have a bacteriome that is abundant in probiotics, including Lactiplantibacillus (48.84%) and Pediococcus (8.82%). Water samples exhibited unique microbiological signatures: Halda River water was mostly characterized by Exiguobacterium (41.93%), while Kaptai Lake water was primarily composed of Acinetobacter (71.24%). Furthermore, functional analysis indicated that fish from the Halda River comprised metabolically diverse communities involved in nitrogen cycling, whereas the Kaptai Lake fish demonstrated a strong capacity for ammonia oxidation and pollutant breakdown. The research offers significant insights into the relationship between the host, microbiome, and environment, with implications for enhancing fish health and promoting sustainable aquaculture practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.