Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41688104›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Artificial intelligence to improve the detection and risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism (AID-PE): protocol for a pragmatic quasi-experimental comparator study.

Samuel George Sinclair Gunning, Joseph Page, Jennifer Rossdale, Pia Frances Pemberton Charters, Benjamin Hudson, Stephen Lyen, Robert Mackenzie Ross, Annette Seatter, Jonathan W Bartlett, Lisa Austin and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06093217 (Developing Artificial Intelligence Solutions to Improve Diagnosis and Risk Stratification in Acute Pulmonary Embolism), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06093217 completednot on this map

Developing Artificial Intelligence Solutions to Improve Diagnosis and Risk Stratification in Acute Pulmonary Embolism

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation TrustRan2024 to 2025Enrolled3,872ConditionsPulmonary EmbolismArmsArtificial Intelligence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Samuel George Sinclair Gunning *Department of Research and Development, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3761-5968
Joseph Page *Department of Research and Development, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Jennifer RossdaleDepartment of Research and Development, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Pia Frances Pemberton ChartersDepartment of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3407-8979
Benjamin HudsonDepartment of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Stephen LyenDepartment of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Robert Mackenzie RossDepartment of Respiratory, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Annette SeatterDepartment of Research and Development, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Jonathan W BartlettDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lisa AustinDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Gareth MyringThe National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Hugh McLeodThe National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Paul MitchellThe National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-4460
Darryl StimpsonBath Pulmonary Hypertension Patient Advisory Group, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Andrew CooksonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, England, UK.
Jay SuntharalingamDepartment of Respiratory, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
Jonathan Carl Luis RodriguesDepartment of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK j.rodrigues1@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal condition requiring timely diagnosis and treatment. CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for diagnosis and indicates PE severity through radiological markers of right heart strain. However, accurate interpretation and communication of these findings is often suboptimal in real-world practice. Artificial intelligence (AI) could alleviate pressure on radiology services by supporting PE identification, risk stratification and worklist prioritisation. Before widespread adoption, AI tools must be rigorously validated for diagnostic accuracy, safety and clinical impact. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This pragmatic single-centre, non-randomised quasi-experimental study will evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and clinical-cost impact of AI-assisted PE detection and risk stratification using AIDOC and IMBIO software. We will recruit two consecutive cohorts of adult patients undergoing CTPAs for suspected PE: a comparator cohort (12 months pre-AI implementation) and an intervention cohort (12 months post-AI implementation). AI will be applied retrospectively to the comparator cohort, while in the intervention cohort, radiologists will have contemporaneous access to the AI's interpretation of CTPA images.A subset of retrospective scans, both PE-positive and PE-negative, will undergo expert thoracic radiologist review to establish a reference standard. Data on patient demographics, clinical management and outcomes will be collected. Clinical management pathways and patient outcomes will be compared between cohorts to assess AI's influence on acute PE management. Health economic modelling will assess the cost-effectiveness of integrating AI technology within the diagnostic workflow of acute PE. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the UK Healthcare Research authority (IRAS 311735, 10 May 2023). Ethical approval was granted by West of Scotland Research Ethics Service (23/WS/0067, 3 May 2023). Results will be shared with stakeholders, presented at national and international conferences, and published in open-access peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06093217.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputed Tomography AngiographyPulmonary EmbolismAcute DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansObservational Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicResearch DesignRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentArtificial IntelligenceComputed tomographyHealth Care CostsPulmonary DiseaseThromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID41688104
PMCPMC12911836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.