ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2026
Evaluation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Guidance for Patients With Spinal Metastasis.
Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends and postoperative complications of spinal metastasis surgery in Thailand between 2015 and 2024: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surgery continues to remain the most effective treatment for spinal metastasis (SM). As the number of surgeries continues to grow, the need for consensus guidelines for optimal perioperative care is imperative. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols were created for this purpose. The objective of this study is to review evidence-based ERAS guidelines for SM surgery. A group of multiple experienced spine surgeons was invited to participate in this study. This group identified 19 ERAS items for SM surgery. The principal literature search utilized MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify contributions related to the topic published. Systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational cohort studies which reported SM surgery related to the ERAS topics were included. The evidence was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Consensus recommendations were reached by the group after a critical appraisal of the literature. Five articles were included to develop the consensus statements for 19 ERAS items. All recommendations on ERAS protocol items are based on the best available evidence. They span topics from preoperative patient education and nutritional evaluation, intraoperative anesthetic and surgical techniques, and postoperative multimodal analgesic strategies. The level of evidence for the use of each recommendation is presented. Based on the best evidence available for each ERAS item within the multidisciplinary perioperative pathways, we presented this comprehensive consensus review for SM surgery. This ERAS elements can be implemented and practiced clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.