ArticlePhysiology & behavior2026
Transection of the glossopharyngeal nerve reduces energy and sugar intake but does not affect fat intake or meal patterns in rats offered a palatable cafeteria diet.
Article in Physiology & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Taste information is transmitted to the brain via branches of cranial nerves VII (chorda tympani, CT, and greater superficial petrosal, GSP), IX (glossopharyngeal, GL), and X (superior laryngeal branch of the vagus) with each nerve innervating relatively segregated fields of taste buds on the tongue, palate, and laryngeal epithelium. Approximately 70% of taste buds reside on the tongue and are innervated by the CT or GL. Previously we found that rats offered a 5-choice cafeteria diet after combined transection of the CT and GL (2NX) ate more fat, less sugar, and larger, but fewer meals each day resulting in no net change in total daily energy intake and suggesting a role for the CT and/or GL in food choice, regulation of macronutrient intake, and satiation signaling, but the role of the individual nerves was unclear. To begin identifying the role of each nerve, this experiment aimed to interrogate the effects of transection of the GL (GLX) on food choice and meal patterns in rats offered a cafeteria diet after recovery from GLX or SHAM surgery. We found that GLX did not affect fat intake or meal patterns, but, compared with SHAM-operated controls, GLX rats had lower sugar intake, driven largely by a heightened preference for the food choice with low fat and low sugar content. These findings indicate that the GLX alone is not responsible for the elevated fat intake or meal size found in rats after 2NX, but could be solely responsible for noted reductions in sugar intake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.