ArticleBody image2026
A mixed-methods study investigating the acceptability of an early acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention to aid adjustment to appearance changes after burns.
Article in Body image, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appearance concerns after burns start soon after injury. However, early psychological interventions to support individuals with their changed appearance are absent. This study investigated the acceptability of an early acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention delivered by a psychological therapist either in person or virtually to help individuals adjust to changes to their appearance after burns. As a secondary objective, the potential effectiveness of ProACTive was also investigated. Using mixed-methods, 13 adults (eight women, five men) participated. Acceptability was measured by uptake rates, module completion rates and interview data. Over two-thirds of participants completed all modules. Three main themes were identified from interviews: An acceptable intervention; Valuing the therapeutic relationship; and Early support is key. Data suggested that ProACTive may be acceptable, although some inconsistencies within the data were observed. Ratings of helpfulness were positive and qualitative feedback suggested that ProACTive seemed helpful by providing space to explore and reflect on appearance changes, developing psychological flexibility and self-compassion, and preparing individuals for being around other people. Positive and negative affect significantly decreased (moderate effect sizes) but no significant changes on appearance concerns, psychological flexibility or self-compassion (small effect sizes) were revealed. ProACTive may be an acceptable early psychological intervention to support the adjustment of appearance changes after burns. Acceptability may be higher in individuals with appearance concerns and those admitted to hospital. The intervention holds promise soon after burns but further research on acceptability and effectiveness is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.