Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41686871›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A refined maximum predictability for next location prediction with fusion knowledge.

Liuhong Huang, Zhaocheng He, Xiying Li, Zhi Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liuhong HuangSchool of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6266-8212
Zhaocheng HeSchool of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiying LiSchool of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Zhi YuSchool of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on maximum predictability for next location prediction aims to derive the theoretical maximum accuracy that an ideal prediction model could achieve, which is crucial for analyzing travel regularity and evaluating prediction models. However, three problems remain: 1) The spatiotemporal information used in existing predictability measures is incomplete; 2) quantifying predictability across diverse spatiotemporal information is challenging due to the limitations of entropic measures; and 3) applications of predictability lack further analysis of individual regularity. In this work, we first summarized spatiotemporal information and categorized it into four types of spatiotemporal knowledge. Next, to better quantify predictability, we proposed a refined maximum predictability based on fusion knowledge and Shannon entropy. Finally, we leveraged individual spatiotemporal knowledge preferences based on the refined maximum predictability to analyze travel regularity and evaluate prediction models. Our experimental results showed that the proposed predictability achieved the best results in both the simulation dataset and actual datasets, with a simulation dataset's mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.06. Furthermore, the evaluation results of prediction models indicated that personalized selection and full utilization of spatiotemporal knowledge are crucial for effective location prediction. This work provides insights into the design and improvement of location prediction models. Codes are available at https://github.com/hlh7/A-refined-maximum-predictability.

Identifiers

PMID41686871
PMCPMC12904585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.