Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41686864›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Shared leadership and project success: The mediational role of individual- and team-related factors.

Beata Bajcar, Jolanta Babiak, Agata Klaus-Rosińska, Joanna Iwko, Dorota Kuchta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beata BajcarFaculty of Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland.
Jolanta BabiakFaculty of Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland.
Agata Klaus-RosińskaFaculty of Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland.
Joanna IwkoFaculty of Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3993-9528
Dorota KuchtaFaculty of Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The existing research on the role of shared leadership in achieving project success is rudimentary but suggests that this role may be important. In this study, we examined the relationship between shared leadership and project success, considering four potential mediators: individual engagement, justice (understood as perceived fairness), team building, and teamwork. We conceptualized project success as a construct with four dimensions: project performance, stakeholder satisfaction, project outcomes, and the subjective evaluation of project success. Alternatively, we allow it to refer to any one of these dimensions separately at the discretion of the decision maker. Our study employed structural equation modelling, surveys of 320 team members in Poland, and established measurement tools for the model variables. Our findings revealed simple mediating effects of individual engagement, team building, and teamwork in the relationship between shared leadership and project success. Additionally, this relationship was serially mediated by chains of factors: individual engagement and team building; justice and team building; individual engagement and teamwork; and justice and teamwork. We identified several strategies for various definitions of project success, which ensure efficient project management when shared leadership is applied. We also discuss the implications of our findings for project management theory and practice.

Indexed as

LeadershipCooperative BehaviorGroup DynamicsHumansPoland

Identifiers

PMID41686864
PMCPMC12904471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.