ArticlePloS one2026
The adaptive functional piecewise ordered weighted averaging method and its application to pollutant concentration analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolving patterns of pollutant concentrations and their rigorous assessment are critical issues in contemporary environmental research and policy-making, with important practical implications for air quality management and regional pollution control. To better support such decisions, scientifically sound multi-criteria ranking methods have become a key research focus. In this paper, we propose a novel adaptive functional piecewise ordered weighted averaging (FP-OWA) method for ranking complex functional data. The method extends the existing functional piecewise ranking-weighting framework by integrating data smoothing, depth-based centrality measures, and rank-based aggregation. We systematically compare the performance of FP-OWA with several existing functional data ranking methods using Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that FP-OWA substantially improves ranking consistency and stability when the data are contaminated by white noise. We further apply FP-OWA to rank the daily average PM2.5 and O3 concentrations in 13 cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in 2023, accurately revealing the spatiotemporal differentiation patterns of regional pollution. These findings provide a solid technical basis for local governments to design pollution control strategies and improve air quality. Future research will focus on extending FP-OWA to highly nonlinear and complex functional data, further enhancing its computational efficiency to meet big-data processing requirements, and exploring additional application scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.