ArticlePloS one2026
L‒asparaginase activity in some endophytic fungi: Glutaminase‒free and low urease co‒activities.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, L‒asparaginase production in several endophytic fungi was evaluated along with their L‒glutaminase and urease co-activities. The effect of L‒asparagine and different culture media on L-asparaginase production were also evaluated. Among the 62 investigated isolates, 49 isolates exhibited L‒asparaginase activity, and the maximum zone index (6.58) was observed in Cladosporium perangustum EL1. Evaluation of L‒glutaminase and urease co-activities in L‒asparaginase-positive isolates screened 19 isolates with no L‒glutaminase activity and four isolates with minimum urease production. L‒asparaginase activity was quantified in 12 selected isolates using the Nesslerization method. Cladosporium cladosporioides Kr5-2 exhibited the maximum L‒asparaginase activity (10.78 U mL-1). Alternaria brassicae C showed high L‒asparaginase activity (7.07 U mL-1) free of L‒glutaminase, and low urease co-activity (1.97 U mL-1). Assessment of the effect of L‒asparagine on L‒asparaginase activity showed that the enzyme is inducible and substrate-regulated. Evaluation of ten different culture media showed that all isolates were able to produce L‒asparaginase on Mineral salts agar and Citrate agar culture media. Also, Cerelose ammonium nitrate agar, Kuehner basal culture medium, and Piefer, Humphrey, and Acree culture medium inhibited L‒asparaginase production in the majority of the isolates. This is the first report of L‒asparaginase production by endophytic fungi isolated from Taxus baccata, Pistacia vera, Prunus avium, Prunus cerasus, and Punica granatum, as well as the investigation of their L‒glutaminase and urease co-activities. Among the evaluated culture media, Mineral salts agar and Citrate agar culture media are suggested here as alternate for MCD. Moreover, Alternaria brassicae C is recommended as a promising isolate for future commercial L‒asparaginase production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.