ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Sleep and smartphone use: Within and between-person relationships from an objective longitudinal smartphone and wearable data donation study.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poor sleep is common and detrimental to health. Smartphone use is often noted as a sleep disruptor, but evidence remains limited and inconsistent. This necessitates research focused on objective, longitudinal designs, as well as analytical approaches that can reveal lagged and reciprocal relationships that capture within- and between-person effects. To address these gaps, the current study investigated within- and between-person lagged and reciprocal effects of sleep duration and smartphone use of 68 participants through longitudinal and objective data donated from iPhones and Apple Watches across 14 consecutive days. Apple Watches objectively measured total sleep and sleep stage durations (REM, core, and deep sleep), while iPhones assessed total smartphone use duration and in-bed smartphone use. Two Dynamic Structural Equation Models (DSEMs), one with total sleep and one with sleep broken down into three sleep stages, were conducted. At the within-person level, more total smartphone use increased same-day in-bed smartphone use, β = .25 (95% CI .20, .31), which in turn led to more same-day overall sleep, β = .08 (95% CI .02, .14). Additionally, results indicated stable between-person habits, with strong day-to-day associations for each variable with its own next-day value, β = .53-.82 (95% CI .47, .88). Findings contradict the perspective of smartphones as sleep disruptors, despite leaving open whether this added sleep means poorer rest or a real benefit of in-bed smartphone use. Furthermore, the strength of the between-person results emphasizes the importance of habits in this relationship. In studying day-to-day smartphone use and sleep, these findings provide nuanced empirical insights supporting health and policy recommendations regarding smartphone use and sleep hygiene.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.