Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41686826›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

New approaches to meta-analyze differences in skewness, kurtosis, and correlation.

Pietro Pollo, Szymon M Drobniak, Hamed Haselimashhadi, Malgorzata Lagisz, Ayumi Mizuno, Laura A B Wilson, Daniel W A Noble, Shinichi Nakagawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pietro PolloEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6555-5400
Szymon M DrobniakEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Hamed HaselimashhadiEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Malgorzata LagiszEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Ayumi MizunoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, Canada.
Laura A B WilsonSchool of Archaeology and Anthropology, The Australian National University, Acton, Australia.
Daniel W A NobleDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Shinichi NakagawaEvolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7765-5182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological differences between males and females are pervasive. Researchers often focus on sex differences in the mean or, occasionally, in variation, albeit other measures can be useful for biomedical and biological research. For instance, differences in skewness (asymmetry of a distribution), kurtosis (heaviness of a distribution's tails), and correlation (relationship between two variables) might be crucial to improve medical diagnosis and to understand natural processes. Yet, there are currently no meta-analytic ways to measure differences in these metrics between two groups. We propose three effect size statistics to fill this gap: Δsk, Δku, and ΔZr, which measure differences in skewness, kurtosis, and correlation, respectively. Besides presenting the rationale for the calculation of these effect size statistics, we conducted a simulation to explore their properties and used a large dataset of mice traits to illustrate their potential. For example, in our case study, we found that females show, on average, a greater correlation between fat mass and heart weight than males. Although calculating Δsk, Δku, and ΔZr will require large sample sizes of individual data, technological advancements in data collection create increased opportunities to use these effect size statistics. Importantly, Δsk, Δku, and ΔZr can be used to compare any two groups, allowing a new generation of meta-analyses that explore such differences and potentially leading to new insights in multiple fields of study.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicAnimalsComputer SimulationFemaleMaleMiceSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID41686826
PMCPMC12928594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.