ArticlePloS one2026
Impacts of climate change on basin vegetation based on Biome-BGC model: A case study with the Jialing River Basin.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vegetation, as a key component of land cover, plays a vital role in regulating energy exchange and water balance at different spatial and temporal scales. It is thus important to explore dynamic processes of changes in vegetation cover under changing environmental conditions in the context of global climate change. In this study, the Jialing River Basin (JRB) was selected as a case study, with the leaf area index (LAI) used as the primary indicator to represent JRB vegetation cover and growth status. The Biome-BGC model was employed to simulate the growth of various vegetation types within the basin. We calibrated the optimal range of multiple physiological and ecological parameters of vegetation and analyzed vegetation responses to climate change. The results showed that under four CMIP6 climate scenarios (SSP126, SSP245, SSP370, and SSP585), both temperature and precipitation in the basin are projected to increase. From 1976 to 2016, the vegetation coverage of the basin remained high, and on a monthly timescale, the grasslands are more responsive to climate-induced variability than woodlands. Under the influence of a warmer, more humid climate from 2023 to 2100, the LAI of vegetation in the basin is projected to show an increasing trend, and the vegetation coverage of woodland will still exceed that of grassland. These findings contribute to a more accurate simulation of vegetation dynamics under climate change and can inform the development of effective vegetation conservation and management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.