ArticlePloS one2026
Lifestyle and environmental risk factors for myopia in children: Evidence from a large-scale cross-sectional study in Shandong, China.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myopia has emerged as a pressing global public health issue, with a particularly sharp rise observed among school-aged children. This period represents a critical window for implementing timely, evidence-based interventions to slow myopia progression and mitigate the risk of high myopia. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and associated risk factors of myopia among children aged 9-12 years in Shandong Province, China, with a specific focus on the roles of demographic characteristics, environmental exposures, and behavioral patterns. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2024 using a stratified cluster sampling design. A total of 77,629 children from 16 cities were enrolled. Data collection included standardized visual acuity assessments and structured questionnaires. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the associations between behavioral factors and myopia. Only variables that showed significant associations in univariate (chi-square) analyses were included in the models, without additional adjustment for other potential confounders. The overall prevalence was 41.24%, increasing with age and reaching 44.34% at 12 years. Significant demographic risk factors included female sex (OR=1.030,95%Cl = 1.001-1.060), urban residency (OR=1.045,95%Cl = 1.014-1.077), and parental myopia, particularly when both parents were affected (OR=1.320,95%Cl = 1.270-1.372). Behavioral risk factors included reading while lying down (OR=1.093,95%Cl = 1.035-1.154), screen exposure exceeding three hours per day (OR=1.058,95%Cl = 1.010-1.109), and homework duration over three hours per day (OR=1.072,95%Cl = 1.033-1.112). Protective factors comprised outdoor activity five or more times per week (OR=0.898,95%Cl = 0.865-0.932), maintaining proper posture during reading and writing (OR=0.925,95%Cl = 0.898-0.952), screen viewing distance over three meters (OR=0.933,95%Cl = 0.905-0.961), and sleeping at least eight hours per night (OR=0.918,95%Cl = 0.876-0.961). These findings underscore the multifactorial etiology of myopia, shaped by environmental, and behavioral influences. They highlight the urgent need for comprehensive and targeted interventions, particularly for high-risk groups. This study provides robust empirical evidence to inform region-specific myopia control strategies and supports the development of public health policies aimed at improving pediatric vision health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.