ArticlePloS one2026
Undergraduate occupational therapy students' perceptions of their preparedness for splinting in hand rehabilitation: An exploratory study at the University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHand rehabilitation, particularly splinting, is a key area in occupational therapy. However, existing literature suggests that students often feel inadequately prepared, particularly concerning splinting in hand rehabilitation. This highlights the need for further research and improvements. This research explored the perceptions held by undergraduate occupational therapy students regarding splinting in hand rehabilitation at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, with the aim of informing curriculum improvements. The novelty of this study lies in its focus on the University of KwaZulu-Natal, providing institution-specific insights that are currently underexplored in the literature, using Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory, to contextualise this study.
methodsThis qualitative study gathered data from 3rd and 4th year occupational therapy students at the University of KwaZulu-Natal using purposive sampling. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups was followed. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews using a piloted question guide and thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Ethical clearance was received for this research.
resultsThis research comprised 16 participants: n = 5 males and n = 11 females, all of whom were undergraduates. The number of physical clinical fieldwork blocks completed by the participants ranged from two to three. The number of splints made during these blocks ranged from no splints to four or more. Four distinctive themes emerged: student readiness and preparedness, challenges in splinting, comparison of readiness in 3rd and 4th year, and suggested solutions to bridge the gaps.
conclusionDespite acquiring theoretical knowledge, students felt underprepared and uncertain due to limited clinical opportunities, inadequate supervision, and minimal hands-on practice during fieldwork. This lack of confidence and competence may deter students from pursuing specialisation in hand rehabilitation. To address these gaps, students recommended strategies such as increasing practical time dedicated to splinting, introducing training earlier in the program, expanding the splinting curriculum to cover a broader range of splint types, and strengthening university support structures, which align with existing literature, that emphasises the crucial role of hands-on experience in fostering confidence and competence. These findings have implications for curriculum development and suggest the need for policy reforms prioritising clinical competency in undergraduate occupational therapy education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.