Observational studyPloS one2026
Concurrent depression and anxiety in women undergoing additional diagnostic procedures due to positive screening for cervical cancer.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUndergoing additional diagnostic procedures due to a positive cervical cancer screening in women can lead to psychosocial burden. This study investigated the co-occurrence of depression and anxiety in women both before and after additional diagnostic procedures for cervical cancer.
methodsThis prospective observational study with repeated measures was conducted in a cohort consisting of all consecutive women (N = 172) who received an abnormal Pap screening test result and therefore presented to a gynecologist for additional diagnostic examinations. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the independent predictors of the concurrent depression and anxiety occurrence among women while undergoing additional diagnostic procedures due to positive screening for cervical cancer.
resultsThe prevalence of concurrent depression/anxiety among women while undergoing additional diagnostic procedures due to positive screening for cervical cancer was elevated from 34.3% before diagnostics to 46.5% after diagnostics (P < 0.05). Also, the prevalence of more severe concurrent depression/anxiety was higher after diagnostics than before diagnostics. Multivariate logistic regression presented that worry (regarding cervical cancer, general health, the result of the next cytology test, and having sex) was an independent significant predictive factor for concurrent depression/anxiety in women before undergoing additional diagnostic procedures due to positive screening for cervical cancer. Multivariate logistic regression presented that urban place of residence, history of induced abortion, and sedative use were predictive factors for concurrent depression and anxiety in women after undergoing additional diagnostic procedures due to positive screening for cervical cancer.
conclusionConcurrent depression and anxiety occurrence was highly prevalent among women while undergoing additional diagnostic procedures due to positive screening for cervical cancer. This prospective observational study showed a correlation between certain risk factors and concurrent depression/anxiety, although it is difficult to determine causality of this association due to the limitations of the study design. Only evidence that establishes causality can definitively guide the implementation of specific procedures and interventions during cervical cancer screening aimed at reducing concurrent depression/anxiety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.