Trial reportNeuroimmunomodulation2026
The Effect of Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid on Cellular Immune Responses to Experimental Sleep Restriction in Healthy Humans.
Trial report in Neuroimmunomodulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSleep deficiency is known to increase the risk for multiple disease conditions involving immunopathology, in which inflammation is thought to be a mechanism for disease development. Thus, one potential way to mitigate negative health consequences of deficient sleep is to target inflammation. We investigated whether low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) administration prior to and during exposure to an experimental sleep restriction challenge affects cellular immune responses to sleep restriction.
methodsWe studied 46 healthy humans (19F/27M, age range 19-63 years) in a randomized trial with 3 protocols each consisting of a 14-day at-home phase followed by an 11-day (10-night) in-laboratory stay (sleep restriction/ASA, sleep restriction/placebo, control sleep/placebo) with daily ASA (81 mg/day) or placebo intake across the entire study period (at-home and in-laboratory). During in-laboratory stays, sleep opportunity under both sleep restriction conditions was 8 h during 2 pre-challenge nights, 4 h during 5 nights of restricted sleep, and 8 h during 3 nights of recovery sleep. Under the control sleep condition, participants had a sleep opportunity of 8 h/night throughout the protocol. Blood samples were analyzed prior to and following 5 nights of sleep restriction/control sleep, and after 2 nights of recovery sleep. Data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.
resultsExperimental sleep restriction increased WBC, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, basophil, CD4 T-cell counts, and the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio compared to control sleep under placebo (p < 0.01). Low-dose ASA had no effect at pre-challenge for most cell types. However, low-dose ASA attenuated the eosinophil and basophil responses to sleep restriction and reduced elevation of the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio (p < 0.01). Monocyte counts stayed elevated after 2 nights of recovery sleep in the sleep restriction/ASA condition compared to control sleep, whereas monocyte counts recovered under placebo intake (p < 0.01).
conclusionThe present study shows that low-dose ASA can counteract certain cellular immune responses to sleep restriction, in particular elevations in eosinophil and basophil counts as well as the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio, while not affecting most immune cell counts prior to the sleep restriction challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.