ArticleMedicine2026
Diagnostic value of routine fluoroscopy after sleeve gastrectomy: Accuracy, cost, and clinical implications.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic utility of a CT upper gastrointestinal protocol for the detection of gastroduodenal leaks.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staple-line leakage remains one of the most serious complications of sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Although routine postoperative fluoroscopy is commonly performed to detect leaks, its true diagnostic and clinical value remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, and cost implications of routine fluoroscopy compared to selective symptom-driven imaging after SG. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Mersin City Training and Research Hospital and included 301 patients who underwent primary SG between January 2019 and December 2024. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who underwent routine postoperative fluoroscopy (Group I, n = 268) and those managed with selective imaging based on clinical findings (Group II, n = 33). Computed tomography was used as the reference standard to confirm the leaks. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v25. Diagnostic indices, including sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, were calculated, and cost differences were analyzed. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. The leak rate was 0.7% in Group I and 3.0% in Group II (P = .751). Fluoroscopy demonstrated low sensitivity (37.5%), but high specificity (96.2%), and negative predictive value (98.3%), with a moderate receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.67. Despite similar clinical outcomes, the fluoroscopy group incurred higher costs ($4100 ± 650 vs $3500 ± 540, P < .05). Our findings indicate that routine postoperative fluoroscopy after sleeve gastrectomy contributes minimally to diagnostic or clinical decision-making. While its specificity and negative predictive accuracy remain excellent, its limited sensitivity and additional cost reduce its overall value. Adopting a selective, symptom-oriented imaging strategy, supported by clinical evaluation and computed tomography, appears to be safer and more cost-effective. Future multicenter studies that combine clinical evaluation, imaging, and biomarkers may further improve early leak detection and help standardize postoperative care in bariatric surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.