ArticleMedicine2026
A survey study to assess stress and coping during medical education in a Jordanian university.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical education's rigorous demands are known to cause significant stress among students. The study investigated how students evaluate stressors and apply coping strategies to handle perceived stress and examined how these processes relate to sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. The study was guided by the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping (TMSC), and employed an online cross-sectional survey targeting medical students at a Jordanian university (Yarmouk University). The questionnaire covered mental health, including perceived stress, stressors, and coping mechanisms, and also included measures of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. Based on the TMSC, stressors were considered external demands evaluated through primary appraisal, whereas secondary appraisal involved assessing available resources and options for coping, which then informed the strategies students employed. Bivariate tests evaluated associations between the measured factors and stress. Exploratory factor analysis identified the underlying factor structure of 31 stressors and 28 coping strategies. Multivariable Partial Proportional Odds Models analyzed factors associated with stress levels. About 2/3 of 618 respondents reported elevated stress. Major stressors identified through primary appraisal included frequent exams, extensive learning content, and insufficient study time. During secondary appraisal, students assessed their available coping resources. Those who effectively recognized and utilized adaptive coping strategies, such as seeking emotional or instrumental support, experienced significantly lower stress (odds ratio = 0.58). Examination-related stressors were the only stressors significantly associated with a higher likelihood of increased stress (odds ratio = 2.01). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that females were significantly less likely than males to experience high stress levels (odds ratio = 0.42). Higher stress levels also correlated with greater insomnia scores (odds ratio = 1.13). Stress was prevalent among medical students at Yarmouk University, mainly driven by academic demands appraised as threatening. Secondary appraisal showed that students who identified and used coping resources, such as social or emotional support and faith-based practices, were more successful in managing stress. These findings highlight the need for structured interventions grounded in the TMSC framework to foster adaptive coping. Support programs that propose evidence-based techniques to cope with stress could positively enhance medical students' educational experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.