ArticleMedicine2026
Geriatric nutritional risk index is associated with erectile dysfunction.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An essential instrument for evaluating older adults' nutritional status is the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI). This investigation aimed to examine the connection between the GNRI and erectile dysfunction (ED) risk. Three models were created, and the connection between GNRI and ED was investigated through multiple linear and logistic regressions. The nonlinear relationship between GNRI and ED was evaluated using smooth curve fitting. To further confirm the consistency of GNRI and ED relationships across various populations, subgroup analysis, interaction tests, and sensitivity analyses were employed. The receiver operating characteristic curve was applied to evaluate how well GNRI could forecast the occurrence of ED. Among 1898 participants, GNRI was negatively associated with the risk of ED occurrence. In the fully adjusted model, the risk of ED decreases by 4% (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, P = .0032) for every 1-unit rise in GNRI. Compared with the low GNRI group (<98), the risk of ED decreased by 35% (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.98, P = .0386) for every 1-unit increase in the high GNRI group (≥98). A negative, nonlinear connection between GNRI and ED was found using smooth curve fitting. The negative relationship between GNRI and ED remained consistent across most subgroups (P for interaction > .05). The sensitivity analysis and the receiver operating characteristic curve (with an area under curve of 0.651) demonstrate GNRI's good predictive ability. A higher GNRI was significantly associated with a lower risk of ED occurrence. The GNRI is a reliable, independent predictor of ED occurrence in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.