ArticleMedicine2026
Oral health status and esophageal diseases: Univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization analyses.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests a profound connection between oral health status and esophageal diseases. Nevertheless, the causal relationship remains controversial. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study was performed to probe into the genetic causality between oral health status and esophageal diseases. Summary statistics from genome-wide association studies were obtained from the FinnGen project and the UK Biobank consortium. The number of instrumental single nucleotide polymorphisms per trait ranged from approximately 8.97 million to 16.38 million. The analyzed datasets included sample sizes of up to 4,63,010 individuals. Univariable MR analyses were conducted to explore the potential bidirectional causality between oral health status and esophageal diseases. Inverse-variance weighted method was primarily employed. To confirm the reliability of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses, including Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, and leave-one-out test. Furthermore, we conducted multivariable MR analysis to adjust for potential confounders. Mouth ulcers were strongly associated with esophageal carcinoma and Barrett's esophagus. Toothache tended to increase the risk of Barrett's esophagus. Excessive attrition of teeth was an increased risk for gastro-esophageal reflux. Patients with dental caries exhibited an increased susceptibility to ulcer of esophagus. In reverse, Barrett's esophagus increased the risk of chronic periodontitis and excessive attrition of teeth. Ulcer of esophagus tended to increase the risk of excessive attrition of teeth. Sensitivity analysis yielded consistent results, indicating no heterogeneity or pleiotropy. This study suggests potential causal associations between oral health status and esophageal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.