Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41686598›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

A clinical and nonclinical professionals assessment on the perceptions of ISO standards on healthcare practices and patient safety in Saudi Arabia.

Eyad Talal Attar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eyad Talal AttarDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1898-854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards in healthcare aim to improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of medical devices, clinical processes, and health management systems of various countries across the world. This study reviews the perception of healthcare professionals about ISO standards at Saudi Arabia concerning patient safety, medical device management, and their overall influence on clinical and nonclinical practices. The previous study was based on the global healthcare systems of the US and Europe-like developed countries. The online cross-sectional survey of 300 respondents was selected from all regions and professions. Most of the respondents were from urban regions: Riyadh represented 30.4%, Jeddah 25.2%, and the Eastern Province represented 18.6%. The biomedical engineers constituted 43.3%, physicians comprised 29.2%, and most of the participants were males, 87%. Response to the question about ISO standards was that 79.8% agreed that ISO standards play a critical role in improving patient safety; biomedical engineers demonstrated 85.2%, while physicians were at 82.6%. Medical device calibration garnered 81.0% agree that ISO standards on calibration of medical devices are important. Differences across the 4 major regions demonstrated a strong level of agreement among respondents in Riyadh and Makkah but weaker levels among those in Asir and the Northern Borders, as follows: Riyadh 81.5%, Makkah 78.9%, Asir 58.9%, and Northern Borders 53.2%. ISO adoption barriers were reported for mostly nonclinical areas; training shortage, 56.8%, and resource unavailability were the main factors that acted as the main barriers. Besides, full agreement with relevance among ISO standards came to 85.9% among professionals with more than 15 years of experience. The inference to be drawn from such findings is that the same throw a critical light on the reception and application of ISO standards in Saudi healthcare and pinpoints those areas that require further amelioration and awareness across regions and professional groups.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelPatient SafetyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEquipment and SuppliesFemaleHumansMaleSaudi ArabiaSurveys and Questionnairesclinical testinghealthcare practiceshealthcare professionalsISO standardsmedical device managementnonclinical adoptionpatient safetySaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID41686598
PMCPMC12908780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.