ArticleMedicine2026
Comparison of clinical efficacy and bleeding risk between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in elderly patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and bleeding risk of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in elderly patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A retrospective analysis was performed on 161 elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) who underwent PCI at our hospital between June 2022 and June 2024. Patients were divided into a ticagrelor group (TG; n = 82) and a clopidogrel group (CG; n = 79) based on their postoperative antiplatelet therapy regimen. Baseline clinical data were compared between the 2 groups. The patients were followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and unplanned revascularization. Secondary outcomes included bleeding events (classified according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria), stent-related events, platelet function parameters, adverse drug reactions, and quality of life scores (SF-36 scale). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with MACE. The overall bleeding event rate was higher in the TG than that in the CG (18.29% vs 7.59%, P = .053), with most cases classified as mild-to-moderate bleeding. The overall incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the TG than in the CG (1.22% vs 5.06%, P = .203). Subgroup analyses indicated that ticagrelor showed a trend toward reducing MACE in patients with both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Platelet function tests showed that the platelet aggregation rates in the TG were significantly lower than those in the CG at 24 hours and 7 days after surgery (P < .05). Regarding adverse drug reactions, the incidence of dyspnea was significantly higher in the TG than that in the CG (13.41% vs 2.53%, P < .05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that increasing age (odds ratio = 1.075, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.011-1.142, P = .028) and a history of myocardial infarction (odds ratio = 2.981, 95% CI: 1.032-8.712, P = .046) were independent risk factors for MACE. In elderly patients undergoing PCI, ticagrelor demonstrates a potential advantage over clopidogrel in preventing MACE, with stronger platelet inhibition and lower rates of stent thrombosis; however, this benefit is accompanied by a higher risk of bleeding and adverse reactions, such as dyspnea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.