Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41686551›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

Comparison of clinical efficacy and bleeding risk between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in elderly patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective study.

Jianjing Luo, Guoquan Liang, An Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianjing LuoTeaching and Research Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Zhaoqing Medical College, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0009-0005-9326-0470
Guoquan LiangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Guangzhou Dongsheng Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
An ChenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second People's Hospital of Zhaoqing, Zhaoqing, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and bleeding risk of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in elderly patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A retrospective analysis was performed on 161 elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) who underwent PCI at our hospital between June 2022 and June 2024. Patients were divided into a ticagrelor group (TG; n = 82) and a clopidogrel group (CG; n = 79) based on their postoperative antiplatelet therapy regimen. Baseline clinical data were compared between the 2 groups. The patients were followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and unplanned revascularization. Secondary outcomes included bleeding events (classified according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria), stent-related events, platelet function parameters, adverse drug reactions, and quality of life scores (SF-36 scale). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with MACE. The overall bleeding event rate was higher in the TG than that in the CG (18.29% vs 7.59%, P = .053), with most cases classified as mild-to-moderate bleeding. The overall incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the TG than in the CG (1.22% vs 5.06%, P = .203). Subgroup analyses indicated that ticagrelor showed a trend toward reducing MACE in patients with both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Platelet function tests showed that the platelet aggregation rates in the TG were significantly lower than those in the CG at 24 hours and 7 days after surgery (P < .05). Regarding adverse drug reactions, the incidence of dyspnea was significantly higher in the TG than that in the CG (13.41% vs 2.53%, P < .05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that increasing age (odds ratio = 1.075, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.011-1.142, P = .028) and a history of myocardial infarction (odds ratio = 2.981, 95% CI: 1.032-8.712, P = .046) were independent risk factors for MACE. In elderly patients undergoing PCI, ticagrelor demonstrates a potential advantage over clopidogrel in preventing MACE, with stronger platelet inhibition and lower rates of stent thrombosis; however, this benefit is accompanied by a higher risk of bleeding and adverse reactions, such as dyspnea.

Indexed as

ClopidogrelHemorrhagePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTicagrelorAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStentsTreatment OutcomeClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTicagrelorbleeding riskclopidogrelelderly patientsmajor adverse cardiovascular eventspercutaneous coronary interventionticagrelor

Identifiers

PMID41686551
PMCPMC12908781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.